From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Dalhouse

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 19, 2021
19 Civ. 3543 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

19 Civ. 3543 (AT)

07-19-2021

SHARON ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. NICKIESHA DALHOUSE, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge

The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. Accordingly, the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case, and to mail a copy of this order to Defendant pro se.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Dalhouse

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 19, 2021
19 Civ. 3543 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Ellis v. Dalhouse

Case Details

Full title:SHARON ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. NICKIESHA DALHOUSE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

19 Civ. 3543 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2021)