Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-0052 (ESH)
04-24-2012
JERRY ELLIS-HEMBY, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON TOATLEY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
On March 19, 2012, defendants filed a motion pursuant to Federal Civil Rule of Procedure 12(b)(1) and (2) to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. On March 20, 2012, the Court issued an order advising the pro se plaintiff to respond to the motion to dismiss no later than April 20, 2012, and informing her that if she did not timely respond, the motion could be deemed conceded and result in the dismissal of the complaint. (Order, Mar. 20, 2012 [Dkt. No. 6].) Plaintiff has neither responded nor sought an extension of time in which to respond. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 5] is GRANTED as conceded; and it is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED.
_________________
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE
United States District Judge