From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Paul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 20, 2018
Case No. 0:18-cv-00403 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Dec. 20, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 0:18-cv-00403 (NEB/KMM)

12-20-2018

JACOB ELLIOTT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DAVID PAUL, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the November 14, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine Menendez. [ECF No. 24.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: December 20, 2018

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Elliott v. Paul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dec 20, 2018
Case No. 0:18-cv-00403 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Dec. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Elliott v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:JACOB ELLIOTT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DAVID PAUL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Dec 20, 2018

Citations

Case No. 0:18-cv-00403 (NEB/KMM) (D. Minn. Dec. 20, 2018)