Duke v. Reed, 64 Tex. 705, 715; Browne v. King, 111 Tex. 330, 336, 235 S.W. 522; Hannay, Admr., v. Thompson, 14 Tex. 142; French v. Grenet, 57 Tex. 273; Calhoun v. Lumpkin, 60 Tex. 185; Rodriguez v. Haynes, 76 Tex. 225, 13 S.W. 296; Mozoch v. Sugg, (Com. App.) 254 S.W. 770; Baker v. Collins, 4 Texas Civ. App. 520[ 4 Tex. Civ. App. 520], 23 S.W. 493; Hays v. Tilson, 18 Texas Civ. App. 610[ 18 Tex. Civ. App. 610], 45 S.W. 479 (application for writ of error refused); Vanderwolk v. Matthaei, 167 S.W. 304 (application for writ of error refused); Elliott v. C. C. Slaughter Co., 236 S.W. 1114; Majors v. Strickland, 6 S.W.2d 133; Bryan v. Kales, 162 U.S. 411, 16 Sup.Ct. 802, 40 L.Ed. 1020; Stouffer v. Harlan, 68 Kan. 135, 74 P. 610, 64 L. R. A. 320, 104 Am. St. Rep. 396; Jaggar v. Plunkett, 81 Kan. 565, 106 P. 280, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 935; Kaylor v. Kelsey, 91 Neb. 404, 136 N.W. 54, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 839; Jones on Mortgages, (8th ed.) Vol. 2, Secs. 886, 887, pp. 219-221. It is settled also that the mortgagee has the right to retain possession until the debt is paid, even though the debt is barred by limitation.