Opinion
Civil Action 13-1011
11-03-2022
CYNTHIA ELLIOTT v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC., et al.
SECTION M (2)
ORDER & REASONS
BARRY W. ASHE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is a motion by plaintiff Cynthia Elliott to deem admissible the opinions of her purported general causation expert, Dr. Jerald Cook, because of the defendants' alleged spoliation of evidence related to the oil-spill clean-up workers' exposure to oil and other chemicals. Elliott's spoliation motion is nearly identical to the one filed by the plaintiff, fully briefed, and denied by this Court in Fairley v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., No. 17-3988, R. Doc. 89 (E.D. La. Nov. 3, 2022). Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in Fairley,
R. Doc. 34.
IT IS ORDERED that Elliott's spoliation motion (R. Doc. 34) is DENIED.
Also before the Court is Defendants' Daubert motion in limine to exclude the general causation opinions of plaintiff's medical expert Cook and Defendants' motion for summary judgment arguing that the case should be dismissed because Elliott cannot prove general causation without Cook's opinions. Elliott responds in opposition to both motions, and Defendants reply in further support of their motions.
R. Doc. 26.
R. Doc. 27.
R. Docs. 30; 31.
R. Docs. 39; 41.
Defendants' Daubert and summary judgment motions here are nearly identical to those filed by Defendants, and granted by this Court, in other B3 cases. See, e.g., Brister v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 3586760 (E.D. La. Aug. 22, 2022); Burns v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 2952993 (E.D. La. July 25, 2022); Carpenter v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 2757416 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022); Johns v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811088 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022).
The June 21, 2022 version of Cook's report was used in this case. R. Doc. 26-5. The Court has reviewed all versions of Cook's report and concludes that none of the later versions cures the previously identified deficiencies in his prior reports; specifically, none of Cook's reports provides admissible general causation opinions.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in those cases, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Daubert motion to exclude Cook (R. Doc. 26) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 27) is GRANTED, and Elliott's claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.