Ellington v. Kendall

1 Citing case

  1. McCray v. McDonough

    No. 22-2154-DDC (D. Kan. Aug. 27, 2024)

    On this basis a court in our Circuit recently held that an increased workload wasn’t a materially adverse action when the increase “did not significantly change [plaintiff’s] duties, and the additional work fell within her position description and pay grade.” Ellington v. Kendall, No. 1:20-CV-00174, 2023 WL 2466090, at *25 (D. Utah Mar. 10, 2023).