From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elias v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 7, 2011
No. CIV 10-244-TUC-CKJ (GEE) (D. Ariz. Apr. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV 10-244-TUC-CKJ (GEE).

April 7, 2011


ORDER


On March 9, 2011, Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 24] in which she recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] be granted in part and this matter be remanded for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Edmonds advised the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), any written objections were to be filed and served within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed within the time provided.

Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 24] is ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] is GRANTED IN PART;

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation;

4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this case and shall then close its file in this matter.

DATED this 5th day of April, 2011.


Summaries of

Elias v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 7, 2011
No. CIV 10-244-TUC-CKJ (GEE) (D. Ariz. Apr. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Elias v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET ELIAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 7, 2011

Citations

No. CIV 10-244-TUC-CKJ (GEE) (D. Ariz. Apr. 7, 2011)

Citing Cases

Robles v. Saul

Material inconsistencies and ambiguities in the ALJ's decision generally warrant remand. See Perez v. Astrue,…

Reeves v. Saul

The ALJ's internal inconsistency in his decision coupled with the ALJ's failure to illuminate the basis for…