From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elhlak v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 28, 2013
Case No. 4:12cv502 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 4:12cv502

08-28-2013

AMER T. ELHLAK Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 17, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 9) be GRANTED for Defendant in its entirety and that Plaintiff take nothing by any of his claims here.

The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court.

Therefore, Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED for Defendant in its entirety and Plaintiff shall take nothing by any of his claims here.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Elhlak v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 28, 2013
Case No. 4:12cv502 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Elhlak v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:AMER T. ELHLAK Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. 4:12cv502 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2013)