From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elder v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 14, 2014
No. 05-13-01111-CR (Tex. App. May. 14, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-13-01111-CR

05-14-2014

DAMIAN ELDER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-53551-K


ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On April 22, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant's brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is represented by retained counsel Jeffery Buchwald; (3) Mr. Buchwald's explanation for the delay in filing appellant's brief is that the reporter's record of the motion for new trial was not filed until after appellant's brief was due; and (4) Mr. Buchwald requested additional time to file appellant's brief. We note that the supplemental reporter's record was filed on April 1, 2014 and the appeal was not abated for findings until April 22, 2014. Accordingly, we DO NOT ADOPT the finding that appellant should be given sixty more days to file his brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY DAYS of the date of this order. If the brief is not filed by that date, we will order the appeal submitted without briefs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties.

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Elder v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 14, 2014
No. 05-13-01111-CR (Tex. App. May. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Elder v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN ELDER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: May 14, 2014

Citations

No. 05-13-01111-CR (Tex. App. May. 14, 2014)