From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

El-Shaddai/Wilkerson v. Schulyar

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 12, 2024
2:24-cv-00646 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00646 CAS (ADS)

03-12-2024

Adonai El-Shaddai/Wilkerson v. L. Schulyar, Warden


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) filed by Adonai El-Shaddai/Wilkerson (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner, on January 22, 2024. (Dkt. No. 1.) On January 23, 2024, the Court notified Petitioner that he did not pay the required $5.00 filing fee or submit a completed Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Request”), and that he must do so within thirty days. (Dkt. No. 2.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), a prisoner seeking to proceed with a civil action without prepayment of fees must submit “an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees” as well as “a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.”

As of the date of this Order, Petitioner has not paid the mandatory $5 filing fee or filed a properly completed IFP request. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with his Petition, he must either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or (2) file a properly completed IFP Request by no later than March 26, 2024.

If Petitioner no longer wishes to pursue his claims, he may request a voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to attach a Notice of Dismissal Form (CV-09) to this Order for Petitioner's convenience.

Petitioner is expressly warned that failing to comply with this Order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute or to obey Court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 41-6.

This order is nondispositive. However, if Petitioner believes this order erroneously disposes of any of his claims or precludes any relief sought, he may file objections with the district judge within 20 days of the date of the order. See Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155, 1162 (9th Cir. 2015).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

El-Shaddai/Wilkerson v. Schulyar

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 12, 2024
2:24-cv-00646 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2024)
Case details for

El-Shaddai/Wilkerson v. Schulyar

Case Details

Full title:Adonai El-Shaddai/Wilkerson v. L. Schulyar, Warden

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 12, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00646 CAS (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2024)