Summary
holding a written warning was not an adverse employment action because it did not adversely affect the plaintiff's terms, conditions, or benefits of employment
Summary of this case from Cox v. Huntington Museum of Art, Inc.Opinion
No. 11-2309
05-30-2012
ARLESTER EL JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.; KAROL DEWITT, Human Resources Manager, in her official capacity; TOM LEASE, Warehouse Manager, in his official capacity; DOLE FRESH VEGETABLES, INC., Defendants - Appellees.
Arlester El Jones, Appellant Pro Se. James Bernard Spears, Jr., Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00292-MOC)
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arlester El Jones, Appellant Pro Se. James Bernard Spears, Jr., Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Arlester El Jones appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Dole Food Co., No. 3:10-cv-00292-MOC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED