From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ekblad v. Boeing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00968-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00968-AWI-JLT

01-16-2013

RICHARD D. EKBLAD, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendant.

JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES Jay S. Rothman, Bar No. 49739 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD D. EKBLAD PAYNE & FEARS LLP Daniel F. Fears, Bar No. 110573 Matthew J. Cute, Bar No. 265158 Attorneys for Defendant THE BOEING COMPANY


JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES
Jay S. Rothman, Bar No. 49739
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICHARD D. EKBLAD
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
Daniel F. Fears, Bar No. 110573
Matthew J. Cute, Bar No. 265158
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BOEING COMPANY

Assigned for all purposes to:

Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii

and Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE

WHEREAS Plaintiff RICHARD D. EKBLAD ("Plaintiff") filed his Complaint for damages against Defendant THE BOEING COMPANY ("Defendant") on March 25, 2011 in the California Superior Court, County of Kern.

WHEREAS Defendant removed the action to The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on June 9, 2011.

WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant have now entered into a complete and full settlement agreement that resolved all issues in the Complaint, and between Plaintiff and Defendant.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Richard Ekblad and Defendant The Boeing Company, by and through their counsel of record, that the above-captioned action in its entirety, and all claims for relief brought by Plaintiff, be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

IF IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the parties agree to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES

By: ______________________

JAY S. ROTHMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RICHARD D. EKBLAD

PAYNE & FEARS LLP

By: ______________________

DANIEL F. FEARS

Attorneys for Defendant

THE BOEING COMPANY

ORDER AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Upon reading and filing the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto for dismissal with prejudice of the entire action, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that this action be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs to achieve said dismissal. The Clerk is hereby directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ekblad v. Boeing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00968-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Ekblad v. Boeing Co.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD D. EKBLAD, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY; and DOES 1 through…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00968-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)