From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Mar 12, 2013
393 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 98753.

2013-03-12

Scott T. EISSLER, Claimant/Appellant, v. ALLIED WATERPROOFING CO., Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

ORDER



Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy's determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Mar 12, 2013
393 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Eissler v. Allied Waterproofing Co.

Case Details

Full title:Scott T. EISSLER, Claimant/Appellant, v. ALLIED WATERPROOFING CO.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

393 S.W.3d 620 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)