Summary
rejecting challenge based on SSR 11-2p where, at its crux, Plaintiff's argument was not that the ALJ failed to comply with the Ruling, but that he made the wrong inferences from the evidence he did consider
Summary of this case from McCarl v. ColvinOpinion
Case No. 3:13-cv-00873-KI
05-08-2014
COLIN EISSFELD, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.
Lance R. Clark Attorney for Plaintiff S. Amanda Marshall United States Attorney District of Oregon Ronald K. Silver Assistant United States Attorney John C. Lamont Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant
Lance R. Clark
Attorney for Plaintiff
S. Amanda Marshall
United States Attorney
District of Oregon
Ronald K. Silver Assistant United States Attorney
John C. Lamont
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant KING, Judge:
Based on the record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and this case is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________
Garr M. King
United States District Judge