From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisenhour v. Stafford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Nov 26, 2013
9:12-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 26, 2013)

Summary

adopting recommendation of Hawthorn, J.

Summary of this case from CAN Capital Asset Servicing v. Whitaker Trucking, LLC

Opinion

9:12-CV-62

11-26-2013

WILLIAM LEE EISENHOUR v. LANA STAFFORD (FELPS)


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case is assigned to the Honorable Ron Clark, United States District Judge, and was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn for pretrial proceedings pursuant to a General Order 13-13. The court has received and considered the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 50), who recommends that the court partially grant the Plaintiff's "Motion for Default Judgment" (Doc. No. 40). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 50) is ADOPTED; and the Defendant's "Motion for Default Judgment" (Doc. No. 40) is GRANTED in part. A final judgment will be entered separately.

______________________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Eisenhour v. Stafford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Nov 26, 2013
9:12-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 26, 2013)

adopting recommendation of Hawthorn, J.

Summary of this case from CAN Capital Asset Servicing v. Whitaker Trucking, LLC

adopting recommendation of Hawthorn, J.

Summary of this case from First State Bank of Livingston v. First Bankers Corp.
Case details for

Eisenhour v. Stafford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LEE EISENHOUR v. LANA STAFFORD (FELPS)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 26, 2013

Citations

9:12-CV-62 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 26, 2013)

Citing Cases

Whirlpool Corp. v. The Individuals, P'ships, & Unincorporated Ass'ns That Own or Operate www.Filter1pro.com

“Once a defendant is in default, the court accepts as true all facts set forth in the complaint aside from…

Whirlpool Corp. v. Shenzhen Lujian Tech. Co.

“Once a defendant is in default, the court accepts as true all facts set forth in the complaint aside from…