From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2021
20 Civ. 2488 (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 2488 (PED)

06-03-2021

ELAINE EISENBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLD FLOWERS DESIGN, et al., Defendants,


ORDER

PAUL E. DAVISON, U.S.M.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted against the appearing defendant (Gold Flowers Design, Inc.) in the above entitled action are settled, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the above entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to any party, subject to reopening if either: (1) the settlement is not concluded within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; or (2) an appearing party files a motion for relief against the non-appearing defendant (The Mansion at Lawrence, LLC) within thirty (30) thirty days of the date of this Order,

Because the non-appearing defendant has not Consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 636(c), any such motion must be directed to Judge Halpern in the first instance.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 3, 2021
20 Civ. 2488 (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Eisenberg v. Gold Flowers Design

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE EISENBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLD FLOWERS DESIGN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 2488 (PED) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2021)