Opinion
Case No. 12-C-0699
10-25-2013
DECISION AND ORDER
Holly J. Eisberner has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment dismissing this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). She contends that such relief is appropriate because my decision to dismiss this case was based on a manifest error of law. See, e.g., Blue v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 698 F.3d 587, 597 (7th Cir. 2012) (noting that commission of manifest error of law is reason to grant Rule 59(e) motion). I do not believe that my decision was based on a manifest error of law and will stand on the reasons stated in my order of July 17, 2013.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment is DENIED.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 25th day of October, 2013.
____________________________
LYNN ADELMAN
District Judge