From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ein Cao, Inc. v. Shahinian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 14, 2020
20 CIVIL 1656 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2020)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 1656 (LAK)

04-14-2020

EIN CAO, INC., and RUSSELL NAFTALI Plaintiffs, v. VAHE SHAHINIAN, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo-Endorsed Order dated April 13, 2020, motion granted to the extent the complaint is dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

April 14, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Ein Cao, Inc. v. Shahinian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 14, 2020
20 CIVIL 1656 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Ein Cao, Inc. v. Shahinian

Case Details

Full title:EIN CAO, INC., and RUSSELL NAFTALI Plaintiffs, v. VAHE SHAHINIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

Citations

20 CIVIL 1656 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2020)