From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eigeman v. Peppermill Casinos, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2013
3:11-CV-0219-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0219-RCJ (VPC)

01-03-2013

DOUGLAS EIGEMAN, Plaintiff, v. PEPPERMILL CASINOS, INC., Defendant.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

The District Court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment in its entirety with prejudice on July 9, 2012 (#46). This case is closed. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a jury trial (#48) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: __________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Eigeman v. Peppermill Casinos, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2013
3:11-CV-0219-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Eigeman v. Peppermill Casinos, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS EIGEMAN, Plaintiff, v. PEPPERMILL CASINOS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0219-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)