From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eichner v. Bowery Savings Bank of New York

City Court of New York — General Term
Dec 1, 1896
18 Misc. 749 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)

Opinion

December, 1896.

A. Kling, for respondent.

M. Goodman, for appellant.


We agree with the justice sitting in Special Term that the complaint herein should have alleged that the check in suit was made payable to the order of Field, Chapman Fenner, was indorsed by them, and as so indorsed was presented for payment to the defendant, and then refused.

Without such allegation the complaint was demurrable. 18 N.Y.S. 545.

For this reason and for the reasons assigned by the justice at Special Term, in his opinion, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

VAN WYCK, Ch. J., and O'DWYER, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.


Summaries of

Eichner v. Bowery Savings Bank of New York

City Court of New York — General Term
Dec 1, 1896
18 Misc. 749 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)
Case details for

Eichner v. Bowery Savings Bank of New York

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN EICHNER, Appellant, v . THE BOWERY SAVINGS BANK OF NEW YORK…

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1896

Citations

18 Misc. 749 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)