From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eichler v. Tedford

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Mar 2, 1912
162 Cal. 762 (Cal. 1912)

Opinion

L.A. No. 3009.

March 2, 1912.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. Walter Bordwell, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Tedford v. Eichler, ante, p. 214, [ 121 P. 730].

Will D. Gould, and G.L. Whitham, for Appellant.

D.C. Burrey, and Harris Swanwick, for Respondent.


The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler, (L.A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [ 121 P. 730], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the order appealed from is affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.


Summaries of

Eichler v. Tedford

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Mar 2, 1912
162 Cal. 762 (Cal. 1912)
Case details for

Eichler v. Tedford

Case Details

Full title:MAIME L. EICHLER, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of…

Court:Supreme Court of California,Department Two

Date published: Mar 2, 1912

Citations

162 Cal. 762 (Cal. 1912)
122 P. 1128