From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehsanuddin v. Wolpoff Abramson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-708 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-708.

February 16, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 15th day of Feb., 2007, after the plaintiff, Salma Ehsanuddin, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after defendant, Wolpoff Abramson, filed a Motion to Dismiss, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party desires to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Ehsanuddin v. Wolpoff Abramson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 16, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-708 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Ehsanuddin v. Wolpoff Abramson

Case Details

Full title:SALMA EHSANUDDIN, Plaintiff, v. WOLPOFF ABRAMSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 16, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-708 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

In re Keeler

The statute of limitations foreclosed judicial remedies rather than eliminat[ed] the underlying…

In re Keeler

The statute of limitations foreclosed judicial remedies rather than eliminat[ed] the underlying…