From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehrets v. City of Binghamton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 31, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

October 31, 1967


Appeal by defendant (1) from a judgment entered upon a verdict awarding damages to plaintiff for an assault committed upon him by defendant's police officers and (2) from an order of said court which denied defendant's motion to set aside said verdict. The verdict was not, as defendant contends, against the weight of the evidence. The jury was warranted in accepting plaintiff's version of the affair as against that of the police officers who participated in arresting and confining him. His version was supported by strong circumstantial evidence and by other proof, while the testimony of the police officers was weakened by contradictions and inconsistencies. Defendant contests the award for punitive damages but did not except to the charge concerning them. ( Brown v. Du Frey, 1 N.Y.2d 190, 195; Raplee v. City of Corning, 6 A.D.2d 230, 232.) Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to respondent. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Gibson, P.J.


Summaries of

Ehrets v. City of Binghamton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 31, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Ehrets v. City of Binghamton

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EHRETS, Respondent, v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Loomis v. City of Binghamton

Defendant, however, made no exception to the trial court's charge to the jury on the issue of punitive…

Gross v. City of Binghamton

Judgment, County Court, Broome County, entered on December 19, 1972, affirmed, with costs. (See Ehrets v.…