From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehouse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 7, 2002
817 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D02-85.

June 7, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Kenneth R. Lester, Jr., Judge.

Clifford J. Ehouse, Sanderson, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


This is an appeal of a denial of a motion to withdraw a plea subsequent to sentencing. The trial court found the motion was untimely because the motion was not made within 30 days after rendition of the sentence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170( l). The appellant argues that the Department of Corrections ("DOC") cancelled his gain time contrary to the trial court's intent in sentencing him. This argument is not addressed to any error committed by the trial court or any misunderstanding by the defendant, but rather with DOC's forfeiture of gain time.

We agree with the trial court that the motion was not timely. See Williams v. State (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 3, 2002). Additionally, the DOC had the authority to forfeit the gain time. Forbes v. Singletary, 684 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.


Summaries of

Ehouse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 7, 2002
817 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Ehouse v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD J. EHOUSE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 7, 2002

Citations

817 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Perry v. State

AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. State, 894 So.2d 935 (Fla. 2005); Ehouse v. State, 817 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA…