From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehmer v. Modernismo Publications, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 5, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The plaintiffs' time to comply with items 2, 3 and 4 of the appellants' notice for discovery is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, and the appellants' time to appear at the plaintiffs' business offices to inspect certain of the business records demanded to be produced for inspection is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Public policy favors a determination of actions on their merits and the sound discretion of Special Term is to be afforded some latitude in determining what is an excusable default (Krystofic v Rapisardi, 112 A.D.2d 196; Picotte Realty v Aragona, 87 A.D.2d 955). In view of the lack of prejudice to the appellants, the absence of willful noncompliance on the plaintiffs' part, and the potential meritorious nature of the action as set forth in the verified complaint, we find that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in excusing the plaintiffs' default (see, Stark v Marine Power Light Co., 99 A.D.2d 753). Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ehmer v. Modernismo Publications, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1986
120 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Ehmer v. Modernismo Publications, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:KARL EHMER et al., Respondents, v. MODERNISMO PUBLICATIONS, LTD., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Silveri v. Laufer

In order to vacate the default judgment against them, the defendants were required to establish a valid…

P K Marble, Inc. v. Pearce

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision granting the motion to the…