Opinion
April, 1911.
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, J., dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Eglinton v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1911
144 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Summaries of
Eglinton v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1911
144 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for
Eglinton v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:Elizabeth A. Eglinton, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1911
Citations
144 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)