Opinion
No. 05-03-00597-CR
Opinion Filed September 30, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F00-23673-I. Affirmed.
Before Justices WRIGHT, RICHTER, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard Steven Eggers appeals his conviction, after revocation of deferred adjudication community supervision, for failure to register as a sex offender. Punishment was assessed at eighteen months confinement in a state jail facility. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.