upholding the denial of a motion to amend a complaint where appellant "failed to meet its burden of setting forth with particularity the grounds for supporting its motion"
Summary of this case from Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLCNo. 99-7660.
March 6, 2000.
Appeal from the S.D.N.Y.
Vacated.
upholding the denial of a motion to amend a complaint where appellant "failed to meet its burden of setting forth with particularity the grounds for supporting its motion"
Summary of this case from Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLCadopting Bugg test
Summary of this case from Kohlhausen v. SUNY Rockland Cmty. Coll.denying motion to amend where "appellant has given no indication of what amendment is proposed that would state a valid claim for relief," and therefore "failed to meet its burden of setting forth with particularity the grounds for supporting its motion"
Summary of this case from Herrick v. Grindr LLCdenying leave to amend because the plaintiff "ha[d] given no indication of what amendment [was] proposed that would state a valid claim for relief" and had thus "failed to meet its burden of setting forth with particularity the grounds for supporting its motion"
Summary of this case from Kravitz v. TavlariosFull title:Efco Corp. v. Nortek, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Mar 6, 2000
Two courts have considered the nature of credit reports under the Robinson-Patman Act. See Credit Chequers…
Metrokane, Inc. v. Wine EnthusiastIn general, a district court should give parties notice of its intent to convert a motion to dismiss into a…