From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Yates

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Mar 7, 2011
SACV 06-1024-DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2011)

Opinion


STEVEN RAY EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. JAMES YATES, Warden, Respondent. No. SACV 06-1024-DSF (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. March 7, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Yates

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Mar 7, 2011
SACV 06-1024-DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Edwards v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN RAY EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. JAMES YATES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Mar 7, 2011

Citations

SACV 06-1024-DSF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2011)