From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi, In Banc
Jun 12, 1950
46 So. 2d 790 (Miss. 1950)

Summary

In Edwards v. State, 209 Miss. 325, 46 So.2d 790, it was held that the motion did not allege any facts upon which innocence could be assumed or legal defense could be predicated.

Summary of this case from Rucker v. State

Opinion

No. 37533.

June 12, 1950.

1. Criminal procedure — plea of guilty — motion to withdraw after conviction — when insufficient.

When there has been a conviction of a misdemeanor on a plea of guilty, a motion to be allowed to withdraw the plea and to defend under a plea of not guilty will be overruled when no allegation of innocence is made and no facts are shown upon which innocence could be assumed or a legal defense could be predicated.

Headnote as approved by Hall, J.

APPEAL from the circuit court of Forrest County; F.B. COLLINS, Judge.

Earle L. Wingo, for appellant.

R.O. Arrington, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Appellant was indicted for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and his case was transferred to the county court for disposition. On February 24, 1949, he entered a plea of guilty and four days later he was sentenced to pay a fine of $250.00 and serve 45 days. On the following day he filed a motion for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty. This motion was overruled and on appeal the circuit court affirmed the action of the county court, from which affirmance comes this appeal.

The said motion averred four grounds as a basis for the relief sought. All these grounds have been abandoned on this appeal and a reversal is sought on an entirely different ground, but we do not reach the point of considering the same for (Hn 1) the reason that the motion did not allege that appellant is innocent of the offense charged and did not allege any facts upon which innocence could be assumed or a legal defense could be predicated. The motion stated no defense whatsoever and consequently the lower court cannot be put in error for overruling it. Turner v. State, 121 Miss. 68, 83 So. 404; Fortenberry v. State, 147 Miss. 91, 113 So. 193. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi, In Banc
Jun 12, 1950
46 So. 2d 790 (Miss. 1950)

In Edwards v. State, 209 Miss. 325, 46 So.2d 790, it was held that the motion did not allege any facts upon which innocence could be assumed or legal defense could be predicated.

Summary of this case from Rucker v. State
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARDS v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi, In Banc

Date published: Jun 12, 1950

Citations

46 So. 2d 790 (Miss. 1950)
46 So. 2d 790

Citing Cases

Rucker v. State

G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. I. It is within the sound discretion of the…

Miles v. Monaghan, Sheriff

36 So.2d 459. We are aware of the case of Edwards v. State, (Miss.) 46 So.2d 790, which indicates that the…