From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 19, 2010
35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 4D09-3309.

May 19, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Amy L. Smith, Judge.

Gleston N. Edwards, Raiford, pro se.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.


The defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. We affirm. A Rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the conviction. See Prince v. State, 903 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 19, 2010
35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gleston N. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 19, 2010

Citations

35 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Mccray v. State

Affirmed. See Edwards v. State, 35 So.3d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ.,…

Jones v. State

Rule 3.800(a) cannot be used to challenge the conviction or the sufficiency of the evidence. See Edwards v.…