From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 2004
888 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 5D04-2900.

December 3, 2004.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

Alfonzo Edwards, Bushnell, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Alfonzo Edwards appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion, in which he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective. The trial court disposed of the order by explaining that there was no deficient conduct appearing in the record. However, no portions of the record conclusively refuting the assertions of Mr. Edwards are attached, as required by rule 3.850(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State commendably acknowledges that the order denying relief is deficient. Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court with directions either to attach the pertinent portions of the record to support its ruling, or to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issues raised by the motion. See Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 2004
888 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:Alfonzo EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 3, 2004

Citations

888 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Crall v. State

Accordingly, we remand this matter for the trial court either to attach portions of the record supporting its…

Cornett v. State

As a result, the matter is remanded back to the trial court to either attach further portions of the record…