Opinion
No. SC11–2217.
2012-10-17
Roderick EDWARDS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).
The petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus with the Court. To the extent the petitioner seeks to compel the district court to consider his notice of appeal, the petition is dismissed as moot. To the extent the petitioner seeks to collaterally attack his convictions and sentences, the petition is denied for failure to establish that the petitioner has a clear legal right to any relief. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10 (Fla.2000).
Petitioner's “Motion to Supplement to [sic] Petitioner's Reply to Supreme Court Order for an [sic] Response,” “Motion to Supplement to Already Filed Reply Motion,” “Motion to Supplement Already [sic] Reply Motion Which Has [sic] Been Submitted by Petitioner,” and “Motion of Reply to State's Filed Motion Against Petitioner” are granted. Petitioner's “Motion of Corrections and to Strike All Pleadings Motions Which Has [sic] Been Filed” is denied as moot.