From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 10, 2020
289 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-4445

02-10-2020

Douglas T. EDWARDS, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark S. INCH, et al., Respondents.

Douglas T. Edwards, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.


Douglas T. Edwards, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

DENIED . The proceedings in the trial court were civil in nature, so there is no authority to grant a belated appeal. See Hollingsworth v. Szczecina , 731 So. 2d 790, 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ; cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 ("Review Proceedings in Collateral or Postconviction Criminal Cases"); Powell v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections , 727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that the predecessor provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) were not applicable to civil proceedings).

Wolf, Rowe, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 10, 2020
289 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Edwards v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS T. EDWARDS, et al., Petitioners, v. MARK S. INCH, et al.…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 10, 2020

Citations

289 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)