From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Horn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2012
No. 10 Civ. 6194 (RJS) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10 Civ. 6194 (RJS) (JLC)

05-04-2012

WILLIAM EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN HORN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:

By Order dated September 1, 2010, this matter was referred to the Honorable James L. Cott, Magistrate Judge. On March 8, 2012, this Court adopted Judge Cott's Report and Recommendation, dated February 14, 2012, and granted Defendants' motion to dismiss "as to all but one of Plaintiff s claims" - the claim for retaliatory termination against Defendant Rosa and "only to the extent that Plaintiff seeks nominal or punitive damages against her." On April 13, 2012, Judge Cott issued a subsequent Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), recommending that the Court dismiss the remaining claim against Defendant Rosa with prejudice pursuant to Rules 16(f) and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the Report, Judge Cott advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. Cf. Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298 (2d Cir. 1993).

When no objections to a report and recommendation are made, the Court may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face of the record. Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). After reviewing the record, the Court finds that Judge Cott's well-reasoned Report is not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs only remaining claim against Defendant Rosa. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2012

New York, New York

___________

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A copy of this Order has been mailed to:

William Edwards

660 Hegeman Ave

Apt #6-D

Brooklyn, NY 1120


Summaries of

Edwards v. Horn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2012
No. 10 Civ. 6194 (RJS) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Edwards v. Horn

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN HORN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

No. 10 Civ. 6194 (RJS) (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Tessemae's LLC v. Atlantis Capital LLC

Courts in this Circuit regularly dismiss or enter default judgment against parties who fail to appear at…

Perez v. Saul

Because no objections have been filed, the Court "may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face…