Edwards v. Dayton Veterans Med. Ctr.

Full title: DRAKE A. EDWARDS Plaintiff, v. DAYTON VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Case No. 3:14-cv-374 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-374

03-25-2015

DRAKE A. EDWARDS Plaintiff, v. DAYTON VETERANS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant.

Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING EDWARDS' OBJECTIONS (Doc. #10) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 9); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN ITS ENTIRETY; AND DISMISSING EDWARDS' COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to pro se Plaintiff Drake A. Edwards' ("Edwards'") Objections (doc. #10) to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz's Report and Recommendations (doc. #9) regarding proper service of Edwards' Complaint. Magistrate Judge Merz's Report and Recommendations recommends that Edwards' Complaint be dismissed without prejudice.

As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Edwards' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is adopted in its entirety. Edwards' Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Twenty-Fifth Day of March, 2015.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Drake A. Edwards at his last address of record