From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 12, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-457 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-457

01-12-2015

DRAKE A. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. DAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #3); DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DOC. #2) WITHOUT PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his December 23, 2014, Report and Recommendations (Doc. #3), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. Despite being informed of his right to file Objections to the Report and Recommendations, and of the consequences for failing to do so, Plaintiff has not filed any Objections within the time allotted.

Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Date: January 12, 2015

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Edwards v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 12, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-457 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Edwards v. Dayton Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:DRAKE A. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. DAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 12, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-457 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2015)