Opinion
2014-11-25
Edmonds Dental Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Elbert Keener, III and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Paul W. King, Springfield, MO and Richard L. Rollings, Jr., Camdenton, MO, for appellant. Elbert L. Keener, III, Pro Se, Harrison, AR; Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Paul W. King, Springfield, MO and Richard L. Rollings, Jr., Camdenton, MO, for appellant. Elbert L. Keener, III, Pro Se, Harrison, AR; Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: Alok Ahuja, C.J., Cynthia L. Martin, J. and Wayne P. Strothmann, Sp. J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Edmonds Dental Company (“EDC”) appeals a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Elbert Keener was not disqualified for unemployment benefits, because EDC had failed to prove that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).