From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmond v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec 17, 2013
416 S.W.3d 344 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 100129.

2013-12-17

Tony EDMOND, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael David, Judge. Amy Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael David, Judge.
Amy Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Tony Edmond (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Edmond v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec 17, 2013
416 S.W.3d 344 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Edmond v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tony EDMOND, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

416 S.W.3d 344 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)