From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EDLAGAN v. DE LIZO

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 21, 2003
No. C 02-05231 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)

Opinion

No. C 02-05231 WHA

February 21, 2003


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE


On January 31, 2003, this Court ordered plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff was ordered to file a written response by February 14, and was instructed that failure to do so would result in dismissal. Plaintiff did not file a response. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

EDLAGAN v. DE LIZO

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 21, 2003
No. C 02-05231 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)
Case details for

EDLAGAN v. DE LIZO

Case Details

Full title:Virginia M. Edlagan, Plaintiff, v. Carlo de Lizo, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2003

Citations

No. C 02-05231 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)