From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edison v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CV-02026 AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CV-02026 AWI-JLT

02-20-2013

GREGORY EDISON Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE GEO GROUP, INC.; MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION; and JOHN DOES 1-50, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Alyson A. Berg Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant United States of America FELDMAN AND WALLACH (As authorized 02/20/2013) Ian Michael Wallach Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Edison BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP (As authorized 02/20/2013) Susan E. Coleman Attorney for Defendants The GEO Group, Inc. and Management & Training Corporation (MTC)


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
ALYSON A. BERG
Assistant United States Attorney
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT; ORDER

Plaintiff Gregory Edison ("Plaintiff"), Defendants United States of America ("United States"), GEO Group, Inc ("GEO") and Management & Training Corporation ("MTC") (collectively "the parties") stipulate, by and through the undersigned counsel, to extend the deadline for United States to respond to the complaint to and including April 8, 2013.

The parties further agree to continue the date of the scheduling conference currently set for April 9, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California to June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Thurston in Bakersfield, California.

The parties base this stipulation on good cause, which includes the need for United States to review the allegations in the Complaint and respond accordingly.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to continue the time for the United States to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint and the scheduling conference as specified below, and base it on the above-stated good cause. The parties request the court to endorse this stipulation by way of formal order.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦Old Date ¦New Date ¦ +------------------------------------+-------------+-------------------¦ ¦United States' response to Complaint¦March 8, 2013¦April 8, 2013 ¦ +------------------------------------+-------------+-------------------¦ ¦Scheduling Conference ¦April 9, 2013¦June 27, 2013 @9:00¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

_________

Alyson A. Berg

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Defendant United States of America

FELDMAN AND WALLACH

(As authorized 02/20/2013)

_________

Ian Michael Wallach

Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Edison

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN LLP

(As authorized 02/20/2013)

_________

Susan E. Coleman

Attorney for Defendants The GEO Group, Inc.

and Management & Training Corporation (MTC)

ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation submitted the parties, the court hereby extends the time for the United States' to respond to the complaint to April 8, 2013. The scheduling conference currently set for April 9, 2013 is hereby continued to June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Edison v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 20, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CV-02026 AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Edison v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY EDISON Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE GEO GROUP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CV-02026 AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2013)