From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgerton v. George

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 25, 2011
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10cv237 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10cv237.

February 25, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the United States' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the Standing Orders of Designation of this Court, United States Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Howell was designated to consider this Motion and to submit recommendations for its disposition.

On February 4, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed an Amended Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 12] in which he recommended granting the motion to dismiss and dismissing this action. The parties were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's conclusions and recommendations were to be filed in writing within fourteen days of service of the Recommendation and that failure to file objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation would preclude the parties from raising any objection on appeal. [Id., at 14]. The period within which to file objections expired on February 22, 2011 and no written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is supported by the record and the law. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the United States' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6] is hereby GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED.

Signed: February 25, 2011


Summaries of

Edgerton v. George

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 25, 2011
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10cv237 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Edgerton v. George

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY M. EDGERTON, SR., Plaintiff, v. CHARLES GEORGE, VAMCASHEVILLE and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2011

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10cv237 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

Washington v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Plaintiff cannot, therefore, state a cause of action under Section 1983 against the United States."), report…