From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eddy, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 10, 1934
240 App. Div. 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

January 10, 1934.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Erie County.

William P. Conley and Henry B. Staples, for the appellant.

Mark N. Turner, for the respondent.

Present — SEARS, P.J., TAYLOR, THOMPSON, CROSBY and LEWIS, JJ.


The extension of time for the payment of the contractor's obligation for fifteen days by the taking of a note did not discharge the defendant from its obligation to the plaintiff upon the bond. ( Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co., 191 U.S. 416; People v. Traves, 188 Mich. 345; Sampson Co. v. Commonwealth, 202 Mass. 326.) The provision of the ordinance of the city of Buffalo requiring notice to the corporation counsel of the commencement of the action and subsequent proceedings therein, must be read as a part of the bond, inasmuch as the bond was given for the primary purpose of protecting the city. The provisions of the ordinance are directed to a full accomplishment of this purpose. Compliance with this provision of the ordinance was a condition precedent to recovery. It is on this ground solely that we affirm the judgment.

All concur.


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Eddy, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 10, 1934
240 App. Div. 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Eddy, Inc. v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland

Case Details

Full title:E.J. EDDY, INC., Appellant, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 10, 1934

Citations

240 App. Div. 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
269 N.Y.S. 24