From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eddings v. Birkett

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-11215 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 20, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-11215.

November 20, 2007


ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS


This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motions for a certificate of appealability and for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis concerning the Court's denial of his habeas petition.

This Court denied Petitioner's habeas claim on the merits. A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When a federal district court rejects a habeas claim on the merits, the substantial showing threshold is met if the petitioner demonstrates that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claim debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). "A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that . . . jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). In applying this standard, a district court may not conduct a full merits review, but must limit its examination to a threshold inquiry into the underlying merit of the petitioner's claims. Id. at 336-37.

Petitioner asserts that the prosecution presented insufficient evidence of guilt to support his first-degree felony murder conviction. While the Court has concluded that the prosecution presented sufficient evidence of Petitioner's guilt to support his conviction such that his federal constitutional rights were not violated, the Court believes that Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The issue presented is adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability. Given this determination, the Court GRANTS Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 24(a).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eddings v. Birkett

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-11215 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Eddings v. Birkett

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER EDDINGS, Petitioner, v. THOMAS BIRKETT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-11215 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 20, 2007)