From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ED CAREY v. FROST NAT.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Nov 5, 2009
No. 13-09-00081-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00081-CV

Opinion delivered and filed November 5, 2009.

On appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellants' briefs in the above cause were due on June 29, 2009. On September 15, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants Ed Carey Development, L.P., Southwest Ed Carey, L.L.C., Anthony de Ponce, Eliud Garcia, Heriberto Gutierrez, Paulrajan Manoharan, Ruy Mireles, Ramachadran Raju, Fabio Ramos, Jairo Rodriguez, Manuel J. Sanchez and Adrian Gracia that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file their briefs, or file their briefs. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

ED CAREY v. FROST NAT.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Nov 5, 2009
No. 13-09-00081-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)
Case details for

ED CAREY v. FROST NAT.

Case Details

Full title:ED CAREY DEVELOPMENT, L.P., ET AL., Appellants, v. FROST NATIONAL BANK…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

No. 13-09-00081-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)