From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckwood v. Pfirman

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jan 11, 2018
NO. 09-17-00446-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 09-17-00446-CV

01-11-2018

PATRICIA MAYERS ECKWOOD, Appellant v. RICHARD L. PFIRMAN, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 17-30065

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 20, 2017, we notified the parties that an extension of time to file a notice of appeal was required because the notice of appeal was filed late, but within the extension time permitted under the applicable appellate rule. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The appellant, Patricia Mayers Eckwood, did not respond to the Court's notice and did not file a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. No motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice Submitted on January 10, 2018
Opinion Delivered January 11, 2018 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Eckwood v. Pfirman

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jan 11, 2018
NO. 09-17-00446-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Eckwood v. Pfirman

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MAYERS ECKWOOD, Appellant v. RICHARD L. PFIRMAN, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jan 11, 2018

Citations

NO. 09-17-00446-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 11, 2018)