From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echoles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sep 13, 2011
348 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED 95690.

2011-09-13

Carlos ECHOLES, Movant/Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1022–CC00599, Steven Russell Ohmer, Judge.Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Echoles appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Echoles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sep 13, 2011
348 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Echoles v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carlos ECHOLES, Movant/Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

348 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)