Echemendia v. State

Full title: Raudel P. ECHEMENDIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Third District.

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

176 So. 3d 364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 3D15–1943.

09-30-2015

Raudel P. ECHEMENDIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Raudel P. Echemendia, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Raudel P. Echemendia, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.