From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.C. Schroeder Co. v. Clark

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 24, 1948
167 F.2d 739 (10th Cir. 1948)

Opinion

No. 3578.

April 24, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Bower Broaddus, Judge.

Action by Virgil Clark, for himself, and as agent for Jack F. Richardson, and other similarly situated employees of the E.C. Schroeder Company, Incorporated, to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Judgment for the plaintiff, 73 F. Supp. 1007, and the defendants appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

James C. Hamill and Reuel W. Little, both of Madill, Okla., for appellant.

Thos. W. Champion and Louis A. Fischl, both of Ardmore, Okla., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.


This was an action instituted by Virgil Clark, for himself and others similarly situated, against The E.C. Schroeder Company, a corporation, to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The defendant joined issue. The court entered judgment for plaintiffs; and defendant appealed.

In E.C. Schroeder Co. v. Clifton, 10 Cir., 153 F.2d 385, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 858, 66 S.Ct. 1351, 90 L.Ed. 1629, it was held that employees of the company engaged in the quarrying and processing of stone for gravel cushion and riprap and in the hauling of some of the finished product to the dyke being constructed around the Cumberland Oil Field where crude oil was produced for commerce were entitled to overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees, under the Act, supra. The plaintiffs here were co-workers with such employees there, all being engaged in performing like duties. On the authority of that case, the judgment is

Affirmed.

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in E.C. Schroeder Company v. Clifton, 10 Cir., 153 F.2d 385, 391.


Summaries of

E.C. Schroeder Co. v. Clark

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Apr 24, 1948
167 F.2d 739 (10th Cir. 1948)
Case details for

E.C. Schroeder Co. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:E.C. SCHROEDER CO., Inc., v. CLARK et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 1948

Citations

167 F.2d 739 (10th Cir. 1948)