From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eberle v. Smith

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 27, 2007
CASE NO. 07cvl20-W (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07cvl20-W (WMc).

September 27, 2007


ORDER


On September 25, 2007, a telephonic motion hearing was held in the above captioned case. Participating were Teresa Polk, Esq. (counsel for plaintiff) and Andrea Kimball, Esq. (counsel for defendant). After considering the letter briefs submitted, the Court issues the following Order:

1. Plaintiff is not entitled to the discovery documents inadvertently disclosed by defendant (Documents D00353 — D00385). The Court finds the documents are privileged and not subject to disclosure. See U.S. ex rel Bagley v. TRW, Inc., 204 F.R.D. 170 (C.D., Cal. 2001).

2. Counsel for defendant shall retrieve the documents from the Court on or before September 27, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eberle v. Smith

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 27, 2007
CASE NO. 07cvl20-W (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Eberle v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EBERLE, et al., Plaintiff, v. JEFF SMITH, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 07cvl20-W (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2007)